Monday, December 29, 2008

US Military Might Be Needed To Supress Domestic Violence Given An Economic Collapse

Just in time, a representative of the parasitic state has come out trumpeting the possibility for the need of using military for domestic use, but only in certain circumstances. I wonder who will be provided the responsibility of providing judgment for these circumstances...

Read about it here.

6 comments:

Chris said...

Ah, yes, let us not beef up the coast guard or train domestic militias. Let us put a military unit on U.S. soil, the first move that led to Rome becoming an empire and then derelict.

I also guess the hawks and libertards will be able to justify another Jeju Uprising type event:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeju_Uprising

Chris said...

if the economy gets bad enough for revolution..

Chris said...

And who is championing this crap? Oh, yes, the "Republican" party.

Josh said...

"And who is championing this crap? Oh, yes, the "Republican" party."

Indeed. During one of the presidential debates, McCain called for a freeze on spending increases for everything but the military. Disgusting (not the freeze on spending increases, but to single out the military as the one agency that should be allowed to continue to grow).

"I also guess the hawks and libertards will be able to justify another Jeju Uprising type event"

I'm not sure how'd you compare this to what could happen in the US. From reading the wikipedia article, it almost seems like the UN, the US, and Japan forced a civil war on the Koreans.

Douglas Porter said...

"I'm not sure how'd you compare this to what could happen in the US. From reading the wikipedia article, it almost seems like the UN, the US, and Japan forced a civil war on the Koreans."

I never said the U.S. wasn't the primary cause of the mass murder on Jeju.

Josh said...

Ok then.