Saturday, December 20, 2008

Quote on Taxes

I stumbled upon this quote on LewRockwell.com. I have no idea who Lysander Spooner is or what is entailed in "No Treason", but I thought this cold description of how taxes are taken from individuals compared to how the "highwayman" (a robber) operates to be very real:

The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger, and crime of his own act. He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to use it for your own benefit. He does not pretend to be anything but a robber. He has not acquired impudence enough to profess to be merely a "protector," and that he takes men's money against their will, merely to enable him to "protect" those infatuated travellers, who feel perfectly able to protect themselves, or do not appreciate his peculiar system of protection. He is too sensible a man to make such professions as these. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful "sovereign," on account of the "protection" he affords you. He does not keep "protecting" you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. He is too much of a gentleman to be guilty of such impostures, and insults, and villanies as these. In short, he does not, in addition to robbing you, attempt to make you either his dupe or his slave.

"The proceedings of those robbers and murderers, who call themselves "the government," are directly the opposite of these of the single highwayman.

"In the first place, they do not, like him, make themselves individually known; or, consequently, take upon themselves personally the responsibility of their acts. On the contrary, they secretly (by secret ballot) designate some one of their number [*14] to commit the robbery in their behalf, while they keep themselves practically concealed. They say to the person thus designated:

"Go to A_____ B_____, and say to him that "the government" has need of money to meet the expenses of protecting him and his property. If he presumes to say that he has never contracted with us to protect him, and that he wants none of our protection, say to him that that is our business, and not his; that we choose to protect him, whether he desires us to do so or not; and that we demand pay, too, for protecting him. If he dares to inquire who the individuals are, who have thus taken upon themselves the title of "the government," and who assume to protect him, and demand payment of him, without his having ever made any contract with them, say to him that that, too, is our business, and not his; that we do not choose to make ourselves individually known to him; that we have secretly (by secret ballot) appointed you our agent to give him notice of our demands, and, if he complies with them, to give him, in our name, a receipt that will protect him against any similar demand for the present year. If he refuses to comply, seize and sell enough of his property to pay not only our demands, but all your own expenses and trouble beside. If he resists the seizure of his property, call upon the bystanders to help you (doubtless some of them will prove to be members of our band.) If, in defending his property, he should kill any of our band who are assisting you, capture him at all hazards; charge him (in one of our courts) with murder; convict him, and hang him. If he should call upon his neighbors, or any others who, like him, may be disposed to resist our demands, and they should come in large numbers to his assistance, cry out that they are all rebels and traitors; that "our country" is in danger; call upon the commander of our hired murderers; tell him to quell the rebellion and "save the country," cost what it may. Tell him to kill all who resist, though they should be hundreds of thou- [*15] sands; and thus strike terror into all others similarly disposed. See that the work of murder is thoroughly done; that we may have no further trouble of this kind hereafter. When these traitors shall have thus been taught our strength and our determination, they will be good loyal citizens for many years, and pay their taxes without a why or a wherefore.

"It is under such compulsion as this that taxes, so called, are paid. And how much proof the payment of taxes affords, that the people consent to "support the government," it needs no further argument to show.

9 comments:

Douglas Porter said...

Guess what? Private property is defend the same way, and, yes, the first private property was established by a robber baron.

Josh said...

What do you mean?

Douglas Porter said...

It means that private property was first instituted by force.

Josh said...

...so?

Douglas Porter said...

That means that private property is no different than taxes. It is immoral.

Josh said...

I don't see it. If private property was instituted by force, than someone else would have had to own it before that to be taken from, which completely discredits what you just said.

Douglas Porter said...

"I don't see it. If private property was instituted by force, than someone else would have had to own it before that to be taken from, which completely discredits what you just said."

Everyone owned it, Josh; at least, the territory that the tribe controlled. Then, one day a stronger member of the tribe decided that he could profit better if he controlled a bit of land.

Josh said...

"Everyone owned it, Josh; at least, the territory that the tribe controlled. Then, one day a stronger member of the tribe decided that he could profit better if he controlled a bit of land."

This is why some government is needed, to protect private property. If everyone owned it, then it is still private property, owned by that group, and it was stolen from them, which is against the law.

Douglas Porter said...

"This is why some government is needed, to protect private property. If everyone owned it, then it is still private property, owned by that group, and it was stolen from them, which is against the law."

No, it was communal property. It can't be private without someone excluded. That's the very definition of "private".