I do not take a hard stand on the issue on environmentalism, but this is an interesting perspective:
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Random thoughts and interesting tidbits. . .
. . .focused on current economical and political events.
"But rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual."
Thomas Jefferson
8 comments:
Garbage. By his argument you could call anything that people follow without conclusive evidence religion. His argument is therefore not an argument per se, but a smear campaign disguised as a rational argument.
aren't most things people follow without conclusive evidence religious-like?
Basically. Even science itself has elements of this phenomena. It doesn't, however, discredit environmentalism. That can only be discredited on a proposition by proposition basis.
I think he's attacking the dogma of main stream leaders of the environmentalist movement. Not people like Mom and Dad who are growing organic vegetables and compost, but those that are pushing policy based on their knowledge of the environment.
Its kind of like, if I don't agree with Al Gore, and I have credible evidence to support my position, there is a portion of people within the environmentalist movement who would attack me simply because I disagree, without accepting the credible evidence.
This is what I took from it anyway.
That is propaganda.
what is propaganda?
That entire video.
Post a Comment